[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Kathey Marsden resolved DERBY-3312.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

Received no objections to closing this won't fix. Locators improved performance 
on some operations and slowed others.

> Local Network Server Performance degradation with 10.2 or later
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3312
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3312
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Server
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.1.4, 10.3.2.1
>         Environment: Intel x86 based server SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_03-b05)
> Derby 10.3.2.1
>            Reporter: Timothy Graf
>              Labels: derby_triage10_11
>         Attachments: LobPerf.java
>
>
> We have a Java based XML-RPC client/server product that incorporates an 
> embedded Derby database and network server.  Our client uses the derby JDBC 
> ndriver and network client to connect to the Derby Network Server.
> We recently moved from Cloudscape, which I believe used the 10.1.3.1 Derby 
> code, because of other issues which seem to be resolved by moving to the 
> latest Derby release.  We have a very simple database with a simple table.  
> This table does include BLOBs, however its size has not been an issue and we 
> limit our records to 500.
> Since moving to the latest release of Derby, version 10.3.2.1, we noticed 
> that our clients running on the same machine as our server take much longer 
> to retrieve a list of records from the database.  Our clients running on a 
> remote machine do not seem to have any performance issues when retrieving the 
> same list of records.
> We start our Network Server in Java through the API so I don't think the 
> Security Manager is the issue.  I read that performance could be affected by 
> the Security Manager, but according to the Derby documentation, 
> "The Network Server will not attempt to install a security manager if you 
> start the server from your application using the programmatic API ..."
> I tried going back several releases of Derby and the performance issue seems 
> to go away when I run with version 10.1.3.1 of Derby.  However we see the 
> same issue that we saw with Cloudscape in that we can not turn off connection 
> logging.  We also had stability problems with the Network Server with 
> Cloudscape.
> We would really prefer to use the latest Derby release however the 
> performance issues are a sever limitation.  I thought that maybe this was a 
> simple Network Server configuration issue however after researching this 
> issue I have not found anything from a configuration standpoint that may help.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to