If I change the implementation of one of these DataSource classes, but
in no way modify it's overall "signature" (add/remove/modify public
members) do I need to change the serial version UID?
Thanks,
David
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
David W. Van Couvering wrote:
Hm, I'm not sure if I am interested in venturing into these waters. The
email I sent was about making sure I understaood how things are done
today: DataSource implementations implement Serializable and define
compatibility requirements in the form I described.
I think the ideas of using Referenceable or writing our own custom
serialization code are interesting, but it's not my itch to scratch
right now (unless it's required as part of solving the itch I have to
provide a custom classloader).
The embedded Derby DataSource implementations do implement
Referenceable, that itch has been scratched.
The one exception is EmbeddedSimpleDataSource, which is designed to work
with J2ME (and J2SE), where Referenceable is not available.
Dan.
begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
