[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kim Haase updated DERBY-6609:
-----------------------------
Attachment: DERBY-6609-2.zip
DERBY-6609-2.diff
Attaching DERBY-6609-2.diff and DERBY-6609-2.zip. I removed the list that
contained the meanings of the letters, and updated the topics to reflect my
current understanding of what is and isn't supported -- though I know we're
still waiting for info on a number of SQL:2011 features.
I also changed the structure of the two topics -- I found it annoying and
confusing to have to go back and forth between the topics to figure out which
sub-features in a given category were supported and which weren't. So I put the
unsupported features under the categories into the tables in the main topic,
with "No" to indicate the lack of support. So the "Unsupported features" topic
now contains just two tables, with the features that are entirely unsupported.
I think this simplifies matters. Please let me know if you think it doesn't
work.
> Documentation for SQL features should reflect current standard
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6609
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6609
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Documentation
> Affects Versions: 10.11.0.0
> Reporter: Kim Haase
> Attachments: DERBY-6609-2.diff, DERBY-6609-2.zip, DERBY-6609.diff,
> DERBY-6609.stat, DERBY-6609.zip
>
>
> We document Derby as an SQL-92 database. This standard is now very old, and
> we should describe how Derby conforms to the most current standard
> (SQL:2011). Knut Anders Hatlen listed the relevant features in a comment to
> DERBY-6605.
> This will involve at a minimum replacing the "Derby support for SQL-92
> features" topic
> (http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.10/ref/rrefsql9241891.html) with a new
> one that describes Derby's support for current features, with notes as needed
> indicating when the support is partial. Only features Derby supports, fully
> or partially, should be listed. We should state that features not listed are
> not supported.
> The information would be taken from
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/SQLvsDerbyFeatures (which currently goes only
> through the 2003 standard). Listing the Feature IDs in the documentation
> would also be helpful.
> Other topics should be changed as needed. For example, is the term
> "SQL92Identifier" still correct?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
