It sounds like this is a vote for "none of the above" -- e.g. let's wait
for more submissions, like Brian.
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Since you are a committer and have a binding vote, could you clarify
what you mean by this? Is it a veto or are you just expressing your
opinion?
No, a veto would be a -1 on something. :) I'm expressing my opinion (I
agree with Brian Smith). Perhaps it was confusing since this thread has
[VOTE] in the subject.
I have the feeling that the vote we are doing is on whether we want some
nice, professionally looking graphics versus some home-made crap. Well
of course we want the nice logo. But I think the vote is a bit too much
about presentation and too little about content. I'd like to see more
hi-res, anti-aliased, professionally looking logos before making a
decision. Keeping the Red Hat logo in mind, I'd say "enough with the
hats already". :) I think it's too similar, we'll look like "the Red Hat
database". Also, what people associate with the word Derby varies: A
soccer team, a city in England, horse racing, a hat, more?
But I don't object enough to veto the logo vote. ;)
--
Oyvind Bakksjo
Sun Microsystems, Database Technology Group
Trondheim, Norway
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/bakksjo/
begin:vcard
fn:David W Van Couvering
n:Van Couvering;David W
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc.;Database Technology Group
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Senior Staff Software Engineer
tel;work:510-550-6819
tel;cell:510-684-7281
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard
