[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-499?page=comments#action_12360998 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-499: --------------------------------------------- You have the format correct, my last comment was just an example of one of the places you had the name wrong and it was an extract from svn diff. That's where the java/engine/org/apache/derby/iapi/reference/DRDAConstants.java (revision 0) comes from. > Expose BOOLEAN datatype to end users > ------------------------------------ > > Key: DERBY-499 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-499 > Project: Derby > Type: New Feature > Components: SQL > Versions: 10.1.1.0 > Reporter: Rick Hillegas > Assignee: Rick Hillegas > Attachments: BooleanFS.html, bug499.diff, bug499_doc.zip, bug499_rev2.diff, > bug499_rev3.diff > > Veaceslav Chicu started an email thread on 8 August 2005 titled "boolean > type". He was disappointed that Derby doesn't support the ansi BOOLEAN > datatype. On closer inspection, Derby does internally support this type but > does not expose this support to end users. > Derby should let users declare table columns of type BOOLEAN. This should be > an indexable datatype. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
