[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16278391#comment-16278391
]
sagar commented on DERBY-6809:
------------------------------
Ok. So a safe place to start. The sort package has ample use of Vectors.
Knut, any example where exactly the replacement was made just as a reference.
True, there could not be a major measurable improvement by replacing the Vector
in a mergesort but as you said, I still am unable to read the mind of the
original programmer of this code as to why a Vector (synchronized datatype) was
used in the first place.
> Java 1.8 feature use
> --------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6809
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6809
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Network Server
> Affects Versions: 11.0.0.0
> Reporter: sagar
> Attachments: 2017-12-04-143613_1366x768_scrot.png
>
>
> Suggestion ...
> Is it possible to auto modify the existing source code using tools like
> Netbeans, and take advantage of the new features in JDK 1.8 for better
> multiuser performance and better utilization of current day multicore
> processors?
> Plainly put, can we have from 11.0 onwards a version of derby which takes
> advantage of the advancements and new features in java 1.8 ...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
