[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16309064#comment-16309064 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-6945: -------------------------------------- Yes, exactly! > Re-package Derby as a collection of jigsaw modules > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-6945 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6945 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Affects Versions: 10.13.1.2 > Reporter: Rick Hillegas > Attachments: derby-6945-01-aa-remove_derbyPreBuild_dep.diff, > derby-6945-02-ab-newDerbySharedJar.diff, > derby-6945-02-ac-newDerbySharedJar.diff, derby-6945-03-aa-partitionTest.diff, > derby-6945-04-aa-moveRunClass.diff, > derby-6945-05-aa-removeRedundant_Attribute_SQLState.diff, > derby-6945-06-aa-removeOtherSharedDuplicates.diff, > derby-6945-07-aa-net_client_overlap.diff, > derby-6945-08-aa-move_shared_iapi_under_shared.diff, > derby-6945-08-ab-move_shared_iapi_under_shared.diff, > derby-6945-08-ad-move_shared_iapi_under_shared.diff, jdeps.out.tar > > > Once we commit to building with Java 9 (see DERBY-6856), we should consider > re-packaging Derby as a set of jigsaw modules. This would result in a > different set of release artifacts. This might be a good opportunity to > address the Tomcat artifactory issues raised by issue DERBY-6944. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)