Thanks for the heads-up, David. Derby found no problems with this release candidate. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-7159

On 2/20/24 12:00 AM, David Delabassee wrote:
Welcome to the latest OpenJDK Quality Outreach update!

The first JDK 22 Release Candidates builds are now available [1]. At this 
stage, only P1 issues will still be evaluated. And with the JDK 22 General 
Availability set for March 19th, it is now time to fully focus on JDK 23. At 
the time of writing, one JEP has already been integrated in JDK 23, i.e., JEP 
455: 'Primitive Types in Patterns, instanceof, and switch (Preview)' [2]. But 
new JEP candidates [3][4] have recently been announced, so things should evolve 
rapidly.

I'd like to thank those of you who have already provided feedback on the JDK 22 EA 
builds. Feedback is always extremely useful, even more, when it comes early in the 
development cycle. Another area where we need your help is Loom. So, please make sure to 
check the heads-up below that discusses the so-called Virtual Threads "pinning" 
issue.

[1] https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk/22/
[2] https://openjdk.org/jeps/455
[3] https://openjdk.org/jeps/465
[4] https://openjdk.org/jeps/466


## Heads-up: Virtual Threads “Pinning” Issue

Virtual threads became a permanent feature in JDK 21. This feature has been extremely well received by the 
Java ecosystem but there are still a few pain points. Much has been written about the so-called 
"pinning" issue that arises with synchronized methods or synchronized statements. The two most 
common cases are (a) a virtual thread parks (ex. doing socket I/O) while in a synchronized method, and (b) a 
virtual thread blocks entering a synchronized method because the object's associated monitor is held by 
another thread. In both cases, the underlying carrier/native thread is not "released" to do other 
work. Performance and scalability may suffer and in some cases, starvation and deadlock might happen. This 
recent "Virtual Threads Next Steps" video [5] explains in more details the why's and discusses some 
potential solutions.

New Loom early-access builds haven been recently published [6]. Those Loom EA 
builds have changes to the object monitor implementation that do not pin for 
these two common cases. The Loom team needs your help to test these updated 
object monitors with code that you know is using virtual threads and with 
libraries that are heavily synchronized. The goal is to gauge both reliability 
and performance.

The simplest way to report an issue or feedback is to use the Loom mailing list 
[7]. For the VM savvy, testing with both `-XX:LockingMode=1` (current default) 
and `-XX:LockingMode=2` would be extremely helpful as that would exercise the 
two locking modes currently implemented by the HotSpot VM.

[5] https://inside.java/2024/02/17/virtual-threads-next-steps/
[6] https://jdk.java.net/loom/
[7] https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/loom-dev/


## JDK 22 Release Candidates

The JDK 22 Release Candidate builds (builds 36) are available [8] and are 
provided under the GNU General Public License v2, with the Classpath Exception. 
The Release Notes are available here [9], and the javadocs here [10].

[8] https://jdk.java.net/22/
[9] https://jdk.java.net/22/release-notes
[10] https://download.java.net/java/early_access/jdk22/docs/api/


## JDK 23 Early-Access Builds

The JDK 23 Early-Access builds 10 are available [11], and are provided under 
the GNU General Public License v2, with the Classpath Exception. The Release 
Notes are available here [12].

### Changes in recent JDK 23 builds that may be of interest:

- JDK-8324287: Record total and free swap space in JFR
- JDK-8275338: Add JFR events for notable serialization situations
- JDK-8324665: Loose matching of space separators in the lenient date/time 
parsing mode
- JDK-8324066: "clhsdb jstack" should not by default scan for j.u.c locks 
because it can be very slow
- JDK-8323699: MessageFormat.toPattern() generates non-equivalent MessageFormat 
pattern
- JDK-8325221: Obsolete TLABStats
- JDK-8322535: Change default AArch64 SpinPause instruction
- JDK-8323746: Add PathElement hashCode and equals
- JDK-8325570: Update to Graphviz 9.0.0
- JDK-8303866: Allow ZipInputStream.readEnd to parse small Zip64 ZIP files
- JDK-8320458: Improve structural navigation in API documentation
- JDK-8324068: Improve references to tags in the Doc Comment Spec
- JDK-8322366: Add IEEE rounding mode corruption check to JNI checks
- JDK-8321545: Override toString() for Format subclasses
- JDK-8324301: Obsolete MaxGCMinorPauseMillis
- JDK-8324632: Update Zlib Data Compression Library to Version 1.3.1
- JDK-8324771: Obsolete RAMFraction related flags
- JDK-8323645: Remove unused internal sun.net.www.protocol.jar.URLJarFileCa…
- JDK-8325150: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2024a
- JDK-8324571: JDK 23 L10n resource files update

Note: Complete list of changes can be found here [13].

[11] https://jdk.java.net/23/
[12] https://jdk.java.net/23/release-notes
[13] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/compare/jdk-23+6...jdk-23+10


## JavaFX Early-Access Builds:

These are early access builds of the JavaFX 22 & 23 Runtime built from openjdk/jfx 
[14]. These builds enable JavaFX application developers to build and test their 
applications with JavaFX 22 & 23 on JDK 22 & 23 respectively. Although these builds 
are designed to work with JDK 22 and above, they are also known to work with JDK 17 and 
later versions.

The latest early access builds of JavaFX 22 Builds 29 are available [15], under 
the GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception. JavaFX 
22 API Javadocs [16] are also available.

The latest early access builds of JavaFX 23 Builds 5 are available [17], under 
the GNU General Public License, version 2, with the Classpath Exception. JavaFX 
23 API Javadocs [18] are also available.

[14] https://github.com/openjdk/jfx
[15] https://jdk.java.net/javafx22/
[16] 
https://download.java.net/java/early_access/javafx22/docs/api/overview-summary.html
[17] https://jdk.java.net/javafx23/
[18] 
https://download.java.net/java/early_access/javafx23/docs/api/overview-summary.html


## Topics of Interest

- Java Renaissance Keynote
https://inside.java/2024/02/05/java-renaissance/

- Managing Throughput with Virtual Threads - Sip of Java
https://inside.java/2024/02/04/sip094/

- Data-Oriented Programming in Java 21 - JEP Café
https://inside.java/2024/02/08/jepcafe22/

- Does Java 22 Kill Build Tools? - Inside Java Newscast
https://inside.java/2024/02/15/newscast-63/

- JDK 22 G1/Parallel/Serial GC changes
https://tschatzl.github.io/2024/02/06/jdk22-g1-parallel-gc-changes.html

- Java 22 Previews Statements Before super(...) and this(...)
https://inside.java/2024/02/01/newscast-62/

- State of jextract
https://cr.openjdk.org/~mcimadamore/panama/jextract_changes.html

- FOSDEM 2024: FFM API - A (quick) peek under the hood
https://inside.java/2024/02/13/fosdem2024-ffm-api/

- FOSDEM 2024: Virtual Threads - Next Steps
https://inside.java/2024/02/17/virtual-threads-next-steps/

- Java Language Update - Early 2024 Edition
https://inside.java/2024/02/18/java-language-update-early-2024-update/

- When Should a Compiler Expand Garbage Collection Barriers?
https://robcasloz.github.io/blog/2024/02/14/when-should-a-compiler-expand-garbage-collection-barriers.html

- Emulating C# LINQ in Java using Code Reflection
https://openjdk.org/projects/babylon/articles/linq

- Automatic differentiation of Java code using Code Reflection
https://openjdk.org/projects/babylon/articles/auto-diff


## Java Cryptographic Roadmap Update

The Java Cryptographic Roadmap [19] has been updated with the following planned 
changes.

* Enable XML Signature secure validation mode by default on JDK 11 and JDK 8
- Target date changed from the July 2024 CPU to the April 2024 CPU.
- This change has already been made in JDK 17 and later releases.

* Disable DTLS 1.0 in JDK 17 and 11 with the July 2024 CPU
- This change has already been made in JDK 20 and later releases.
- DTLS is not available in releases prior to JDK 9.

[19] https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html


~

That's it for this installment. As usual, if you have issues, or questions, 
please ping me.

--David


Reply via email to