Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > > Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > > >>Do we need the contributor column? I think we found from the similar >>column in the old to-do list that it encouraged direct e-mails to the >>contact listed. >> >>Dan. >> >> > > I can remove it, but I thought since this list is for short-term use, to > help plan for immediate release, I thought that might be useful.
I'm curious how do you think it would be useful? > I do like your other idea about breaking the table into two... I did see > several improvements that don't require functionality changes was > thinking where to put them. About JDBC 4.0, isn't that some kind of > functionality change, since Derby can now be used on 1.6 platforms? > (pre-release) Derby should be able to run on 1.6 without any JDBC 4.0 support, the JDBC 3.0 driver would still work. I sew it as not a feature because it doesn't provide any useful features, since I believe the JDBC 4.0 driver is currently only stubs. Dan.
