Satheesh Bandaram wrote:

> 
> Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
> 
> 
>>Do we need the contributor column? I think we found from the similar
>>column in the old to-do list that it encouraged direct e-mails to the
>>contact listed.
>>
>>Dan.
>> 
>>
> 
> I can remove it, but I thought since this list is for short-term use, to
> help plan for immediate release, I thought that might be useful.

I'm curious how do you think it would be useful?

> I do like your other idea about breaking the table into two... I did see
> several improvements that don't require functionality changes was
> thinking where to put them. About JDBC 4.0, isn't that some kind of
> functionality change, since Derby can now be used on 1.6 platforms?
> (pre-release)

Derby should be able to run on 1.6 without any JDBC 4.0 support, the
JDBC 3.0 driver would still work. I sew it as not a feature because it
doesn't provide any useful features, since I believe the JDBC 4.0 driver
is currently only stubs.

Dan.

Reply via email to