Ai, hm. Something went wrong in this area when I contributed the tests for IBM. We had LDAP testing also in secureUsers, and I split it into 2, one called secureUsersldap which was supposed to have only the ldap stuff. (see
copyfiles.ant in the tests/jdbcapi dir for traces of my intent).
I think at the time I asked on the list if there was any server available.
As I got no answer, I didn't add the new secureUsersLdap test to any suite.
And it looks like it actually never made it to the svn source at all.
Shall I redo that bit of work, if it seems wortwhile?
Any suggestions of how to actually make this work? I think at the time I had rewritten the secureUsersLdap.sql to have comments & instructions on how to modify the file to make it run in an ldap environment. That was the only way I could think of it - someone modifying the test locally & running it in that changed configuration.
Myrna
On 1/13/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Francois Orsini wrote:
> Testing the case of an ldap server being down is a good negative test itself for
> the Derby LDAP authentication provider...
That's what gets tested (and only tested) today! :-)
Thanks for to info (and to Andrew too).
Dan.
