>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel John Debrunner wrote (2006-03-01 06:31:05): > Bernt M. Johnsen wrote: > > > We should also strive to make "insensitivity" as close to the SQL > > defintion as possible (SQL 2003 p. 96): > > but not when it comes to being updateable apparently :-)
Yes. During this debate it has dawned to me why the SQL standard does not permit a cursor to be both updateable and insensitive. The possible pitfalls are numerous. -- Bernt Marius Johnsen, Database Technology Group, Staff Engineer, Technical Lead Derby/Java DB Sun Microsystems, Trondheim, Norway
pgpCv66Fa1vmA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
