[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-999?page=comments#action_12368678 ]
Andreas Korneliussen commented on DERBY-999: -------------------------------------------- When submitted I did not include this test in any suites, and my intention was to include it once the functionality got in. Instead of making new diff files, maybe it is more productive if someone could review and commit the submitted functionality in 690 ? I think the patch for 690 will address the issues with this test, since there will be no need for master files. I guess issues with 690 could be resolved incrementally ? A number of other issues also depends on 690. > test SURTest.junit fails with ibm142 > ------------------------------------ > > Key: DERBY-999 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-999 > Project: Derby > Type: Bug > Components: Regression Test Failure > Versions: 10.2.0.0 > Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren > Priority: Minor > Attachments: SURTest.diff, SURTest.out, SURTest.tmpmstr > > The test SURTest.junit fails with ibm142. > I'm attaching the .diff, .out, and . tmpmstr files. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
