Bryan Pendleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - That means that now all we have to do is to figure out what message the > client should send the server when the client calls rowUpdated(), and > what message the server should return.
Hopefully, we should not even need a separate round-trip, but get info back with the row data (perhaps via a warning?), so the client would always be aware if a row had been updated as soon as it got it from server. This would have the server generating a special warning when returning an updated row and intercept this warning on the client side, allowing it to keep track of updated status. Is that an acceptable way to go? Dag
