"David W. Van Couvering" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Didn't Rick Hillegas open a bug saying we wanted to get it so all of > Derby can be built on JDK 1.6?
Yes, DERBY-1078. > If this is the case, wouldn't these > issues go away? Or would this force all developers to upgrade to JDK > 1.6? DERBY-1078 only aims to make it possible to build Derby when JAVA_HOME points to JDK 1.6, but it won't make 1.6 required, so the issue will not go away. Anyway, there will still be issues even if 1.6 is required, so I guess we'll just have to live with some extra complexity, both in the build system and the code. -- Knut Anders
