The discussions on this issue have confused me some. Is it the intention
to have a replacement for the ...functionTests/util/DerbyJUnitTest class?
Yes, the intention is to provide a common base class with can be reused
when writing .junit tests. Initially the issue was to fix
DerbyJUnitTest, and all the subclasses to be compatible with running
tests as .junit. I think that is still a long term goal. However
developers do want something they can use now, and they want to provide
reusable Junit components. Therefore providing a new class may be the
shortest path to that goal.
Could it possibly be used in tests that currently run as .junit from
within the functionTests/harness ?
Or would it be a third setup?
This would be compatible with running tests as .junit.
Andreas
Thx, Myrna
