[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093?page=comments#action_12370849 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1093: --------------------------------------- Please wait to commit this patch until the current issues with ugprade and metadata have been identified and there is community concensus on how to approach for 10.2. This change affects metadata.java which impacts the upgrade tests and makes the current task of identifying the issues that exist even more difficult. Relevant issues are: DERBY-1076, DERBY-1107, DERBY-1120, DERBY-1075. > Make DatabaseMetaData.getProcedures() JDBC4 compliant > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-1093 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1093 > Project: Derby > Type: Sub-task > Components: JDBC, Newcomer > Versions: 10.2.0.0 > Reporter: Dyre Tjeldvoll > Assignee: Dyre Tjeldvoll > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 10.2.0.0 > Attachments: derby-1093.v1.diff, derby-1093.v1.stat, derbyall_report.txt, > upgrade.txt > > JDBC 4.0 requires that the result set returned from getProcedures must > contain a new column SPECIFIC_NAME"and that the result set must be ordered by > PROCEDURE_SCHEM, PROCEDURE_NAME and SPECIFIC_ NAME. > The SYSALIASES table already has a column called SPECIFICNAME, so it should > only be necessary to modify the query in metadata.properties. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
