David W. Van Couvering wrote: > > Did I ask this before? Do we want to agree upon a "low water mark" > for code coverage and send out a "Quality Regression" email if our > testing coverage falls below that mark? I think this would have a lot > of value.
This sounds like an interesting idea. Code coverage is an important quality data point. What kind of granularity would it have? Would it be just the overall number or would individual packages or files be flagged? Also for areas that have poor coverage, how could we encourage numbers to be brought up before or during enhancements? Kathey
