In inspecting the exceptions across client and embedded drivers, I
noticed that in the method updateRow(), if the current row has not been
modified, the client throws an exception. However, the embedded driver
returns without taking any action and does not throw an exception.
The JavaDoc for updateRow() says nothing about what behavior is expected.
Does anyone know which one is correct? Given a choice, I would prefer
the more forgiving implementation in the embedded driver. An alternate
is to throw a SQLWarning rather than a SQLException.
Once I have a better sense of what the right behavior is, I can log a
bug about this and attach it to our list of inconsistencies.
Thanks,
David
