[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Knut Anders Hatlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> DerbyNetClient/metadata.out is for jdk<=1.3
>> DerbyNetClient/jdk14/metadata.out is for jdk14 and jdk15
>> DerbyNetClient/jdk16/metadata.out is for jdk>=1.6
>
> I see, thanks for fixing this. 
>
> So just to confirm: If you modify the output from metadata.java you
> need to run (and possibly update the master for):
>
> metadata.java, jdk1x, Embedded
> metadata.java, jdk1x, DerbyNet
> metadata.java, jdk13, DerbyNetClient
> metadata.java, jdk14(5), DerbyNetClient
> metadata.java, jdk16, Embedded
> metadata.java, jdk16, DerbyNet
> metadata.java, jdk16, DerbyNetClient
>
> odbc_metadata.java, jdk1x, Embedded
> odbc_metadata.java, jdk1x, DerbyNet
> odbc_metadata.java, jdk13, DerbyNetClient
> odbc_metadata.java, jdk14(5), DerbyNetClient
> odbc_metadata.java, jdk16, Embedded
> odbc_metadata.java, jdk16, DerbyNet
> odbc_metadata.java, jdk16, DerbyNetClient
>
> Upgrade_xx.java, jdk1x, Embedded
> Upgrade_xx.java, jdk16, Embedded

Almost... If you run 'svn update', you'll see that the list has shrunk
quite a bit:

 metadata.java, jdk1x, Embedded
 metadata.java, jdk1x, DerbyNet
 metadata.java, jdk13, DerbyNetClient
 metadata.java, jdk14 or jdk15 or jdk16, DerbyNetClient

 odbc_metadata.java, jdk1x, Embedded
 odbc_metadata.java, jdk1x, DerbyNet
 odbc_metadata.java, jdk1x, DerbyNetClient

 Upgrade_xx.java, jdk1x, Embedded

> And when the Upgrade test starts working with the NetworkServer we get
> another five cases?

Isn't canon based testing fun? :)

-- 
Knut Anders

Reply via email to