On 4/12/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > o Use the jdk16 javadoc if ant.properties points to a 1.6 installation
Yep, I think that's what I was suggesting. :-) > o Don't exclude the jdbc40 classes from the javadoc at all. If > ant.properties doesn't point at a 1.6 intallation, then they won't be > built anyway. Now we're talking about the engine docs, not the publishedapi javadoc that ships in the release. For the engine docs, I'd suggest a similar setup. If you don't exclude the jdbc40 classes, I'm pretty sure that javadoc will still find them in the source and complain if it can't find the corresponding compiled classfile. andrew
