Re: [jira] Commented: (DERBY-1283) Fill in a deprecated but mandatory JDBC3 method: PreparedStatement.setUnicodeStream()

[Lance J. Andersen]

DJD question> According to which section of JDBC 3.0? Then this is about JDBC 4.0 compliance and not JDBC 3.0. yes and no, the intent has always been there just not clear in print If you feel more comfortable stating this is JDBC4 so be it, but again the intent has always been there, i am just making sure the points are highlighted I don't see how you can change the rules for JDBC 3.0 compliance with a release of the JDBC 4.0 specification. I believe that Sun in the past has confirmed JDBC drivers including Derby & Cloudscape pre-open source as being JDBC 3.0 compliant, seems wrong to say, oh now there's additional work to do. There has never been a TCK to validate JDBC compliance end to end. What there has been is a test suite to validate the requirements of a JDBC driver in a J2EE environment. and the latest version is for J2EE 1.3 with JDBC 2.x.  Passing this allows for a tagline to be used by driver vendors. Dan.