+1, if this is impacting our ability to do merges we should back this
change out.
Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1302?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen reopened DERBY-1302:
---------------------------------------
I think these changes should be backed out for two reasons:
1) This is not the right time to reindent so large parts of the
code, as it makes merging to the 10.1 branch difficult.
2) All of DRDAConnThread (which is one of the largest classes in
Derby) has been reindented to a style that is not used in any
other Derby class (tab width = 8).
If we want to reindent large parts of the code, I think we should do
it sometime after 10.1.3 is released and before the 10.2 branch is
created, and we should try to use a style that is used elsewhere in
the code (I prefer tab-free code myself).
Indent source files touched in DERBY-326
----------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-1302
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1302
Project: Derby
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
Assignee: Tomohito Nakayama
Attachments: DDMWriter.java, DERBY-1302.patch, DERBY-1302_2.patch
Through DERBY-326,some of source code was found not to be orderly indented.
In this task, these files are to be orderly indented.
