I thought we had a general agreement of tabstop=4, not 8. That's what
I"m working with and in general it works pretty well in Derby code.
David
Tomohito Nakayama (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1302?page=comments#action_12414081 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1302:
------------------------------------------
There seems to exist subject of treatment for tab ...
1)
Should it be untabfied ?
2)
If it should be untabfied, what number is best for tab width ?
Tab width=8 is just a configuration in my development environment...
I did'nt think this configuration in untabfy was problem,
because I have seen tab in source code with this configuration and
have been familiared.
I think best configuration would be different according to person ...
Indent source files touched in DERBY-326
----------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-1302
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1302
Project: Derby
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
Assignee: Tomohito Nakayama
Attachments: DDMWriter.java, DERBY-1302.patch, DERBY-1302_2.patch,
DERBY-1302_rollback.patch
Through DERBY-326,some of source code was found not to be orderly indented.
In this task, these files are to be orderly indented.
