[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1376?page=comments#action_12415639 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1376:
----------------------------------------
Is there agreement that the following text for message XSLAT is acceptable:
The log directory {0} exists. The directory might belong to another database.
Check that the location specified for the logDevice attribute is correct.
If so, I can update the message and the one test where this appears and get
this in to 10.1.3.
If I don't hear any consensus from the people involved in the issue by Monday
morning, I will punt this to a later release.
> File java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages_en.properties - Message XSLAT.D
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1376
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1376
> Project: Derby
> Type: Improvement
> Components: Localization
> Versions: 10.1.2.5, 10.1.3.0
> Environment: Text for exceptions
> Reporter: Halley Pacheco de Oliveira
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.1.3.0
>
> The message XSLAT.D (String LOG_SEGMENT_EXIST = "XSLAT.D";) states:
> XSLAT.D=Log directory {0} exists. Please make sure specified logDevice
> location is correct.
> But it seems by the source code that the problem is not that this directory
> exists, but the fact that it is not empty (// make sure log directory is
> empty, in LogToFile.java). So it seems to me that the following message would
> be better:
> XSLAT.D=Log directory {0} is not empty. Please make sure specified logDevice
> location is correct.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
