Rick Hillegas wrote: > There are lots of good suggestions in this message. I would add the > following: If we're going to consider a new test harness, then we could > evaluate using Ant to drive the junit tests. Ant already has an optional > <junit> task for this purpose.
Maybe I wasn't clear, the new harness should be JUnit itself, not something wrapped around JUnit. Then we get all the benefits of Junit for free, integration with ant, IDEs, tests understood by others, etc. Dan.
