[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1600?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner closed DERBY-1600.
----------------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
My confusion, Sorry, just getting used to Junit tests
> JUnit test SURQueryMixTest does not follow the typical pattern for JUnit
> tests.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1600
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1600
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Test
> Affects Versions: 10.2.0.0
> Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
> Fix For: 10.2.0.0
>
>
> SURQueryMixTest overrides runtest instead of providing individual test
> methods, I think this means its setUp and tearDown methods would not be
> called.
> It does not have such methods at the present, bu if someone needed to add
> them then they would waste time figuring out why the methods were never
> called.
> JUnit tests in derby should follow the established pattern, see
> http://junit.sourceforge.net/doc/cookbook/cookbook.htm
> http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyJUnitTesting
> Slows down the progress to moving to JUnit for all tests.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
