[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1130?page=all ]
Deepa Remesh updated DERBY-1130:
--------------------------------
Attachment: d1130-v2.diff
d1130-v2.status
Attaching a patch 'd1130-v2.diff' which ensures that database name set using
setConnectionAttributes does not get used by client data sources. Changes are:
1) Appends the attributes in setConnectionAttributes method to database name
only if database name has been already set on the data source. This will handle
both these cases successfully:
a) When database name is not set as a DataSource property - In this case, if we
pass in database name as a connection attribute, it will not get used.
databaseName is a required Derby DataSource property. If it is not set, we
cannot get a connection using the DataSource. It will fail with the following
exception:
08001 - Required Derby DataSource property databaseName not set.
So, there is no need to append the connectionAttributes to the database name
variable if databaseName DataSource property is not set. This way, we can avoid
using database name in case it is passed in as a connection attribute.
Without the patch, if database name was not set, the code was using "null" as
database name and creating a database named null if "create=true" is specified
or throwing an exception that it cannot connect to database named null.
b) When database name is set as a DataSource property - In this case, if we
pass in database name as a connection attribute, it will not be used. This is
because database name set as DataSource property will over-ride it. This case
is correctly handled (even without the patch).
2) The exception message is changed to indicate we are referring to "Derby
DataSource" property:
08001 - Required Derby DataSource property databaseName not set.
3) Adds test to jdbcapi/checkDataSource.java. Adds a new method
"testClientDSConnectionAttributes" which is run only in client framework.
Modifies master files.
Ran derbyall with this patch using Sun jdk 1.4.2 on Windows XP. No new
failures. (6 failures also seen in tinderbox tests). Please take a look at this
patch. Thanks.
> Client should not allow databaseName to be set with setConnectionAttributes
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1130
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1130
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Network Client
> Affects Versions: 10.1.1.0, 10.1.1.1, 10.1.1.2, 10.1.2.0, 10.1.2.1,
> 10.1.2.2, 10.1.2.3, 10.2.0.0, 10.1.3.0, 10.1.2.4
> Reporter: Kathey Marsden
> Assigned To: Deepa Remesh
> Fix For: 10.2.0.0
>
> Attachments: d1130-client-v1.diff, d1130-client-v1.status,
> d1130-test-dataSourceReference.diff, d1130-test-dataSourceReference.status,
> d1130-v2.diff, d1130-v2.status, derby-1130-v1.diff, derby-1130-v1.status
>
>
> Per this thread, setConnectionAttributes should not set databaseName.
> http://www.nabble.com/double-check-on-checkDataSource-t1187602.html#a3128621
> Currently this is allowed for client but should be disabled. I think it is
> OK to change because we have documented that client will be changed to match
> embedded for implementation defined behaviour. Hopefully its use is rare as
> most folks would use the standard setDatabaseName. Still there should be a
> release not when the change is made and it would be better to change it
> sooner than later:
> Below is the repro.
> Here is the output with Client
> D>java DatabaseNameWithSetConnAttr
> ds.setConnectionAttributes(databaseName=wombat;create=true)
> ds.getDatabaseName() = null (should be null)
> FAIL: Should not have been able to set databaseName with connection attributes
> Also look for tests disabled with this bug number in the test
> checkDataSource30.java
> import java.sql.*;
> import java.lang.reflect.Method;
> public class DatabaseNameWithSetConnAttr{
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> try {
>
> String attributes = "databaseName=wombat;create=true";
> org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDataSource ds = new
> org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDataSource();
> //org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDataSource ds = new
> //org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDataSource();
> System.out.println("ds.setConnectionAttributes(" +
> attributes + ")");
> ds.setConnectionAttributes(attributes);
> System.out.println("ds.getDatabaseName() = " +
> ds.getDatabaseName()
> + " (should be null)" );
> Connection conn = ds.getConnection();
> } catch (SQLException e) {
> String sqlState = e.getSQLState();
> if (sqlState != null &&
> sqlState.equals("XJ041"))
> {
> System.out.println("PASS: An exception was
> thrown trying to get a connetion from a datasource after setting databaseName
> with setConnectionAttributes");
> System.out.println("EXPECTED EXCEPTION: " +
> e.getSQLState()
> + "
> - " + e.getMessage());
> return;
> }
> while (e != null)
> {
> System.out.println("FAIL - UNEXPECTED
> EXCEPTION: " + e.getSQLState());
> e.printStackTrace();
> e = e.getNextException();
> }
> return;
> }
> System.out.println("FAIL: Should not have been able to set
> databaseName with connection attributes");
> }
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira