[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1652?page=comments#action_12428023 ] 
            
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-1652:
---------------------------------------

I don't know much about this code area but I looked at this patch as I am very 
keen to see this in to 10.2 and would also like to get it into 10.1 as soon as 
possible. The approach looks reasonable to me but I have to admit I don't 
understand the full impact of moving the trigger descriptor creation before  
compiling the SPS, so I don't have too much to offer in terms of code review.

On the tests, I have some questions about the the test updates
In updateableResultSet.java  we have this diff.

                        rs.next();
                        System.out.println("column 1 on this row is " + 
rs.getInt(1));
                        System.out.println("this update row will fire the 
update trigger which will update all the rows in the table to have c1=1 and 
hence no more rows will qualify for the resultset"
);
-                       rs.updateLong(1,123);
+                       rs.updateLong(2,2);
                        rs.updateRow();
                        rs.next();

By changing a different value are we still performing the action described?

Similarly in triggerGeneral master update we had  previously  positive test 
cases that now throw an error.  Might we be able to use the workaround you gave 
me, to specify on which columns the trigger will fire to retain the original 
semantics of these tests?



> Update trigger updating the same rows as the original update does not  throw 
> an exception ERROR 54038: "Maximum depth of nested triggers was exceeded" as 
> it should
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1652
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1652
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.0.2.0, 10.2.0.0, 10.1.3.1
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>         Assigned To: Yip Ng
>             Fix For: 10.2.0.0, 10.1.3.2
>
>         Attachments: derby1652-10.1.3-diff.txt, derby1652-10.1.3-stat.txt, 
> derby1652-trunk-diff01.txt, derby1652-trunk-stat01.txt
>
>
> Execution  of  an update trigger that updates the same row  as the original 
> update will  recurse forever and exceed the maximum nesting level of 16 so 
> should throw the exception:
> ERROR 54038: "Maximum depth of nested triggers was exceeded"
> However, it  does not always throw the exception.   For example:
> CREATE TABLE "TEST" (                                           
>       
>  "TESTID" INTEGER NOT NULL GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY (START 
>  WITH 1,
>  INCREMENT BY 1),                                                
>       
>  "INFO" INTEGER NOT NULL,                                        
>       
>  "TIMESTAMP" TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT 
>  '1980-01-01-00.00.00.000000'  
>  );                                                              
>       
>  CREATE TRIGGER UPDATE_TEST                            
>   AFTER UPDATE ON TEST                                 
>   REFERENCING OLD AS OLD                               
>   FOR EACH ROW MODE DB2SQL                             
>   UPDATE TEST SET TIMESTAMP = CURRENT_TIMESTAMP WHERE  
>   TESTID = OLD.TESTID;                                 
>  INSERT INTO TEST (INFO) VALUES  
>  (1),                            
>  (2),                            
>  (3); 
>  UPDATE TEST SET INFO = 1 WHERE TESTID = 2; 
> Does not throw an exception:
> However, If the derby jars are updated to a new version, the correct 
> exception is thrown.
>  Replace derby jars with  new version
>  Execute the following in ij:
>  UPDATE TEST SET INFO = 1 WHERE TESTID = 2; 
>  ERROR 54038: Maximum depth of nested triggers was exceeded.
> Note: This issue stemmed from the Invalid issue,  DERBY-1603, because a user 
> hit the exception after upgrade and thought the exception after upgrade, not 
> the lack of exception before upgrade was the problem. This may be a common 
> user error, so  we need a release note to help mitigate the issue.    I will 
> add one shortly after confirming the correct trigger syntax. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to