"Andrew McIntyre (JIRA)" <[email protected]> writes: > So all we actually need to do is make derbyclient.jar's manifest > equal to derby.jar's with regard to the packages that are > unsealed. Attaching a patch which does that. I have verified that > the test mentioned in the comments for this issue pass with the > patch applied. Comments?
There seems to be an extraneous diff in the patch:
java/client/org/apache/derby/client/net/NetConnectionReply.java
has a javadoc renaming diff.
Dag
