Great -- thank you very much. Kim
Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA) wrote On 08/18/06 19:14,: > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1717?page=all ] > > Knut Anders Hatlen resolved DERBY-1717. > --------------------------------------- > > Resolution: Fixed > Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available]) > > Thanks Kim, this looks like an improvement to me. I added yet another "client > / server" -> "client/server" change to the patch and committed revision > 432771. > > >>Working With Derby task file twwdactivity4.dita is invalid, results in >>missing text >>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Key: DERBY-1717 >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1717 >> Project: Derby >> Issue Type: Bug >> Components: Documentation >> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0 >> Reporter: Kim Haase >> Assigned To: Kim Haase >> Priority: Minor >> Fix For: 10.2.1.0 >> >> Attachments: twwdactivity4.dita.diff, twwdactivity4.html >> >> >>The Working With Derby section >>http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/dev/workingwithderby/twwdactivity4.html is >>missing some text: a coded <title> tag, "Running the client program," >>disappears from the output. >>This happens because the source file twwdactivity4.dita plays tricks with >>DITA to try to get three subsections into a task topic, which does not allow >>subsections. The last of the intended subsection titles fails to appear in >>the output because it is coded as a second <title> element in an <example>, >>which can have only one <title>. (Ant warns about this during processing.) >>And the two titles that do appear are different sizes because one is an >>example title and the other just a paragraph in bold text. >>To be valid DITA, this topic should be coded as a three-step task, where each >>step has a series of substeps. I have taken the liberty of doing this. I have >>also taken the liberty of correcting the punctuation and syntax problems that >>I found. I am attaching a proposed patch. It looks pretty hairy because of >>all the changes, I'm afraid. However, it is now valid DITA and shows the task >>steps clearly. I am attaching the output that results, for comparison with >>the original so you can see the substance is the same. > >
