> Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Oh...
> Our comments were conflicted :)
>
> I see.
> Anyway it seems that I need to work on current implementation of
> NetworkClient.
>
> I will try. 

Great! One extra benefit we get when we have the type check on the
client side, is that the exception is thrown when setXXX() is called,
not on execute(). This way, it is clearer to the users what is
actually causing the error.

Thank you for your hard work on this issue!

-- 
Knut Anders

Reply via email to