[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1746?page=comments#action_12430281 ] 
            
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1746:
--------------------------------------

I'm afraid I'm a bit confused about what to do with these patches:

---------------- Trunk Patch -----------------------------

After I apply this patch to the trunk, I see the following diffs in the 
10_1_10_2 test:

702a703
> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,7
707 del
< complete caseVersionCheck - passed true
707a708
> complete caseVersionCheck - passed false
1462 del
< END - PASS - phase SOFT UPGRADE
1462a1463
> END - FAIL - phase SOFT UPGRADE
2166a2168
> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,7
2171 del
< complete caseVersionCheck - passed true
2171a2173
> complete caseVersionCheck - passed false
2953 del
< END - PASS - phase UPGRADE
2953a2955
> END - FAIL - phase UPGRADE
Test Failed.
*** End:   Upgrade_10_1_10_2 jdk1.4.2_08 2006-08-24 09:12:23 ***

I think that the lines beginning with ",APP,DERBY655T2," are new diffs added by 
this patch. It seems that this patch is making the results dirtier rather than 
cleaner.

In addition, I don't think we should be running a test called 10_1_10_2 in the 
trunk. We should be running some other tests, perhaps 10_1_to_Current and 
10_2_to_Current in the trunk. Perhaps 10_1_10_2 becomes the basis for 
10_1_to_Current.

--------------- 10.2 Patch --------------------------

Right now 10_1_10_2 runs cleanly in the 10.2 branch. After I apply this patch, 
I see the following diffs in the 10.2 branch:

702a703
> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,7
2166a2168
> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,7
Test Failed.
*** End:   Upgrade_10_1_10_2 jdk1.4.2_08 2006-08-24 09:22:45 ***

It seems that some additional steps need to be taken before this patch can be 
applied to the 10.2 branch. Do we know what those are?

> upgrade tests should start using 10.1.3 released builds
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1746
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1746
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Test
>          Components: Test
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
>            Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren
>         Assigned To: Myrna van Lunteren
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: DERBY-1746_102_20060823.diff, 
> DERBY-1746_102_20060823.stat, DERBY-1746_trunk_20060824.diff
>
>
> The upgrade test' master is based on the 10.1 jars checked in to svn -  
> 10.1.1.0 - (208786). 
> However, we now have a newer released version of 10.1 - 10.1.3.  This would 
> be the obvious choice for someone running tests testing the beta jars.
> If the jars are 10.1.3 then a diff will occur because of the fix for 
> DERBY-655:
> 703d702
> < 
> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,
>  7
> 2168d2166
> < 
> ,APP,DERBY655T2,C21_ID,,APP,DERBY655T1,C11_ID,1,3,0,F_12,xxxxGENERATED-IDxxxx,
>  7
> It would be nice if the final build for 10.2 would include an updgrade test 
> master created using 10.1.3, And same is true for the trunk.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to