Deepa Remesh wrote: > On 8/30/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Deepa Remesh (JIRA) wrote: >> > [ >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1551?page=comments#action_12431671 >> ] >> > >> > Deepa Remesh commented on DERBY-1551: >> > ------------------------------------- >> > >> > I think this change (svn revision 430925) missed the mega-merge. Can >> a committer please merge this doc change to 10.2 branch? >> > >> >> Hi, Deepa, >> >> I checked the "Subversion Commits" tab for DERBY-1551. 430925 involved >> two files and it looks like both were merged into the 10.2 branch. >> >> what makes you think it was missed in the mega-merge? > > > > Thanks Jean for checking. I think I looked at svn commit messages and > didn't see one with this revision number. I should have just looked at > the "Subversion Commits" tab. I'll close the issue. Sorry for the > noise.
no problem at all -- I'm glad you raised the issue because I noticed the update to rrefexcept71493.dita. >> And now I'm spotting an issue with updates to rrefexcept71493.dita, >> which was part of 430925 -- it's going to be overwritten by DERBY-1566, >> which will update all the sqlstates. >> > I'll take a look at DERBY-1566. I'll be posting more info in about an hour. But the short story is rrefexcept71493.dita isn't up to date with all the 10.2 changes; I believe the only sane thing to do is generate it automatically using DavidVC's app. -jean
