Jean T. Anderson wrote: > Daniel John Debrunner wrote: >>Jean T. Anderson wrote: > ... >>>1) 10.2 severity column. I bet there's a story why that column didn't >>>make it into 10.1, but I sure don't remember. ... >>The severity by definition (SQLException.getErrorCode) is a non-standard >>piece of Derby. I prefer not to document these values since it might >>encourage JDBC applications to depend on them, thus making it hard to >>migrate applications from Derby. (Ie. leads to Derby lock-in). JDBC 4 >>addresses some of the requirements here by having specific classes of >>SQLException that applications can use, we should be encouraging their >>use instead of non-standard items. > > thanks -- this makes an excellent reason for removing that severity > column and I'll do so.
I removed the "severity" column and the review copy is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12339926/rrefexcept-3.html feedback is welcome, -jean
