[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1756?page=comments#action_12432195 ] 
            
Francois Orsini commented on DERBY-1756:
----------------------------------------

Looks good Sunitha - Just some minor comment...

In ClientBaseDataSource.java, I think it would be good to leave most of the 
logic around support for EUSRIDPWD checks in the file as this would certainly 
get re-enabled once #1517 and #1755 are fixed...I believe they will still be 
valid, even if some logic is being moved around in some other helper classes 
used during secmec handshake/negotiation . They can be left commented out with 
a comment explaining why (such as mentioning JIRA-1517, JIRA-1755) - as I did 
in my note  for the USRSSBPWD upgrade (commented out as well for now).

My IMPORTANT NOTE on USRSSBPWD upgrade comment is out of context if the 3 lines 
above (shown below) are removed...as we will still try to upgrade to EUSRIDPWD 
if the client supports it when it is re-enabled...

-        if (SUPPORTS_EUSRIDPWD)
-            return (short)NetConfiguration.SECMEC_EUSRIDPWD;
-        else

Just some suggestion...meanwhile #1517 and #1755 are addressed....

> Revert change in client that defaults the secmec to eusridpwd.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1756
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1756
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Client
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
>            Reporter: Sunitha Kambhampati
>         Assigned To: Sunitha Kambhampati
>             Fix For: 10.2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: derby1756.diff.txt, derby1756.stat.txt
>
>
> With changes to derby-962, the client would default to eusridpwd if the 
> client jvm supports it.  It is not sufficient to only check if client jvm can 
> support eusridpwd  but we need to verify if the server can support the 
> particular secmec.  
> There are other existing jiras DERBY-1675,DERBY-1517,DERBY-1755 that will 
> help to address the issue of  upgrading to a better security mechanism.
> This jira will change the default security mechanism to 3 as it was before 
> derby-962 changes.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to