Am going to post the few comments I have this afternoon.

On 9/8/06, Mike Matrigali (JIRA) <derby-dev@db.apache.org > wrote:
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1675?page=all ]

Mike Matrigali updated DERBY-1675:
----------------------------------


francois do you have any initial comments on the change?  tests passed for me and they look reasonable but would prefer to get review of someone experienced in this code.  I can work on committing this today or tommorow, but after that I will be away for a week.  This seems like something that would be nice to get into 10.2.

> Network Server should not send to client that it supports EUSRIDPWD when running against Sun JVM
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1675
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1675
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Network Server
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.3.1, 10.1.3.0, 10.1.2.1, 10.1.1.0, 10.0.2.1 , 10.0.2.0, 10.2.1.0
>            Reporter: Sunitha Kambhampati
>         Assigned To: Sunitha Kambhampati
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: derby1675.diff.txt, derby1675.stat.txt
>
>
> As part of ACCSECRD, if the server does not accept the security mechanism sent by the client,  the server will send a list of security mechanism that it supports. Currently even when the server is running with sun jvm,  it will still send EUSRIDPWD as a sec mec that it supports, which is incorrect. The server should test if it can support EUSRIDPWD dynamically  and if it does, only then send EURRIDPWD as an option that it supports.
> see DRDAConnThread.writeACCSECRD(int)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



Reply via email to