David Van Couvering wrote:
Hi, Jean, and all, that sounds good. I also agree that the licensing
stuff can be in release notes. Note that if someone builds JDBC4
functionality of our 10.2 release with the beta JDK will not be able
to put it into production use, but if they build it with the GA JDK
they should be able to. Right?
Hopefully. The bundled Release Notes should probably refer the user to
the website. The website can track incompatibilities, if any, which
accumulate between the time that we ship 10.2 and the time that the JDK
goes GA.
Regards,
-Rick
I would also like to see something like "Derby will be delivering a
follow-on release with compiled JDBC4 drivers once JDK 6 is generally
available."
David
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
On 9/13/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This sounds fine. I was planning on highlighting the license issue in
the Release Notes anyway.
Should we also add a note about compatibility? Something along the
lines of:
"The JDBC 4.0 support in this version of Derby may not be compatible
with the final version of JDBC 4.0."?
andrew
