Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > Jean T. Anderson (JIRA) wrote: > >>Here's the current notice: >>Derby 10.2.1 includes JDBC 4.0 functionality based on a pre-release of Java >>SE 6. > > Do we want to be more precise than that? I had been thinking that Derby > was based upon the "Proposed Final Draft", but now I think more likely > it's based upon Mustang b98. > > Is there a good statement as to what version of JDBC 4.0 Derby is based > upon, and is that version public? > > Maybe the above text is good, but the release notes should state which > point Derby is based upon?
yes, specific details in the Release Notes are important. For the notice that appears in each jdbc4 topic, I think we want the shortest notice possible, with a pointer to the Release Notes. -jean
