Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Mike Matrigali wrote:
I seem to remember some network server bugs fixed this
releaase which were "off by one" kinds of errors that relyed exactly
on a particular byte length in the transfer.
Your memory is accurate; there were indeed such bugs (DERBY-1533 is
a good example) and I think that a set of tests such as you propose
would be valuable indeed.
Fernanda, will your tests run both in embedded mode and against the
client driver? I tried to look at the wiki but it's being grumpy right
now.
thanks,
bryan
Bryan, I am not planning to make any changes to the tests now, except
from converting them to Junit test. After converted a tests will
continue to run against the same driver(s) as it did before it was
converted.
Fernanda
