Well .... This modification may be unneccesary because next 10.3 does
not supoprt jdk13 ...
However, the phenomena was so critical that any setXXXX method is failed
on jdk13 ....
I thought it is too sudden change and difficulty for escaping it is
acceptable.
Then I committed ...
Best regards.
Tomohito Nakayama (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610?page=comments#action_12440735 ]
Tomohito Nakayama commented on DERBY-1610:
------------------------------------------
Committed.
Sending java/client/org/apache/derby/client/am/PreparedStatement.java
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 454098.
Resolve difference of type compatibility between Embedded and
NetworkServer/NetworkDriver
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-1610
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1610
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Network Server, Network Client
Reporter: Tomohito Nakayama
Assigned To: Tomohito Nakayama
Attachments: DERBY-1610.diff, DERBY-1610_2.diff, DERBY-1610_3.diff,
DERBY-1610_4.diff, DERBY-1610_5.diff, DERBY-1610_6.patch, DERBY-1610_7.patch,
DERBY-1610_7_regressionfix.patch, DERBY-1610_7_regressionfix_2.patch,
DERBY-1610_7_regressionfix_2_2.patch, parameterMapping.diff,
parameterMapping.diff,
parameterMapping.diff.betweenEmbedded_and_NetworkServerNetworkClient,
parameterMapping.out.7.diff, parameterMapping.out.diff,
parameterMapping_3.diff, TestNullChar.java, TestTypeCompatibility.java,
XCL12.diff
There exists difference of type compatibility between Embedded and
NetworkServer/NetworkClient.
This issue tries to resolve it.
--
/*
Tomohito Nakayama
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Naka
http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~tomohito/TopPage.html
*/
