Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Kristian Waagan wrote:
Hi,
I think it would be a nice habit to give the TestSuite objects
reasonable names. It makes the test hierarchy look better in the GUI
runners.
A generic/descriptive name could also be added to the suites created
by methods in TestConfiguration.
+1 to both, I never knew how those names were used, now it makes sense
to give them names.
I added DERBY-1971 for improving TestConfiguration.
I consider an ongoing effort to be initiated to name suites in our
existing JUnit tests :)
The most straight-forward approach would be that the developer gives
name to the suite, but there are other ways as well. For instance,
TestConfiguration could probably force the name to be set to the name of
the class from which the suite is created (won't work for all scenarios
of course).
As long as the name is more descriptive than [EMAIL PROTECTED], I'm
happier...
--
Kristian
Dan.
