I don't know if it does copyright cleanups? What this does is modify
the PDF output, which takes over the dita2fo-shell-copyr1.diff.gz (not
used) ,as it assumed that the header was to contain the copyright
information, which the header is now the name of the document. The
dita2fo-shell-copyr1.diff.gz patch should probably be removed, and this
newer patch does not patch over it (deprecated patch :-) ).
It does add the copyright to the title page though...which I thought
appropriate and looked fine. (It could be removed, but was a product of
trying to figure out what was going on/wrong).
scott
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Hi, Scott,
does this fit the DERBY-2237 copyright cleanups? that might be a good
issue to attach the patch to. Either that or create a new issue.
regarding DERBY-2237, I lost track of dita2fo-shell-copyr1.diff.gz .
Sorry! Was that still a good patch for the PDFs? or does your new patch
also change PDFs?
thanks,
-jean
scott hutinger wrote:
I'm not certain if I should create a new issue for this or not.
What this does is modify the dita2fo-shell.xsl to add:
- copyright information on the cover page above the timestamp
- remove the copyright on the header of the body pages, and replace it
with the name of the document.
- The table of contents header has both the version number and the
document name on it.
A couple other things. I tried fop .93 and DITA-OT1.3.1. fop.93 in
different builds together on separately. Fop.93 changes some layout and
looses the table of contents, probably some other items. This more than
likely would take a bit of time to figure out the differences and how to
fix them. As for DITA-OT1.3.1; my first impression is it's probably
best to do a diff with 1.2.x and 1.3.x then goto differences between
1.2.x and the current files that modify the output. I did a direct diff
using meld (visual difference) from 1.3.x and the current files. I
wasn't certain that it was worth the time, but that was before doing
mods to get the header with the document name.
XSLT has some strange side effects; one of them being $booktitle. I
didn't debug, just guessed :-)
The patch was made within the lib directory, so cd lib; patch -p0 <
header1.patch
Anyway, Jean might be the one to tell me what to do...(new issue or
not). I added this as an attachment, just in case anyone was interested
(or not...). I'll do a new issue or use the old one that was hijacked
if best, and add the diff to it also.
scott
