Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Rick Hillegas wrote:
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
...
A wiki page with the proposed backwards compatibility issues
listed together and with definition(s) of secure-by-default would
be good. Since Rick seems to be proposing most of the backwards
compatibility issues he seems like a good candidate to write the
initial version of the page. :-) It could be just the collection
of tables from the various functional specs.
The 10.3 release page now ends with a section which describes
incompatibilities with the previous release:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenThreeRelease
Thanks Rick, from a quick look the DBA powers section doesn't seem
to match the comments in DERBY-2264 related to requiring
authentication. But I'm not sure where that stands, (which is why a
summary is a good thing ;-)
Dan.
Hi Dan,
I'm afraid I'm blind this morning. What discrepancy do you see
between the 10.3 incompatibility section and the comments on DERBY-2264?
The DBA powers section on the wiki page makes no mention that this
change is only in effect if authentication is enabled.
This comment in DERBY-2264 seems to say that the restrictions are
enforced when authentication is enabled.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2264#action_12474538
Dan.
Thanks, Dan. I have updated the wiki page to clarify that the
restrictions depend on authentication.
Regards,
-Rick
