If you have to, to get it work then go ahead. But do note that I have
gotten multiple questions about "missing" system procedures when the
answer was that the user left off the SYSCS_UTIL. -- this is why I
prefer all documentation to have the complete reference. I know it
is likely that a paragraph will explain the need for the complete name -
but users will pick and choose paragraphs/examples and if one usage
is wrong - someone will use it.
Suresh Thalamati wrote:
Laura Stewart wrote:
Okay, is it acceptable in places where we are only discussing the
procedure to omit the SYSCS_UTIL. portion of the name?
Clearly in examples that users might copy/paste we would use the full
name.
In the description of procedures it might be ok to omit the
"SYSCS_UTIL." part , as you mention, it should not be omitted in
the title/syntax/examples.
-suresh
