[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2531?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Saurabh Vyas updated DERBY-2531:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: ConnPoolErr.java

Attached a repro for this issue. Did a comparison on object created earlier & 
then returned by s.getConnection().
I 'll start looking into this in depth, if any one with more Knowledge on 
ConnectionPoolDataSource can give some pointers it would be great help.
Thanks in advance

> client returns different connection on s.getConnection() on a statement 
> obtained from a ConnectionPoolDataSource or XADataSource than the original 
> connection.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2531
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2531
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Client
>    Affects Versions: 10.3.0.0
>            Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren
>         Attachments: ConnPoolErr.java
>
>
> In the following scenario:                
>         ClientXADataSource dsx = new ClientXADataSource();
>         dsx.setDatabaseName(dbName);
>         XAConnection xac = dsx.getXAConnection();
>         XAResource xar = xac.getXAResource();
>         Connection cs1 = xac.getConnection();
>         Statement sru1 = cs1.createStatement();
>         sru1.setCursorName("SN1");
>         sru1.executeUpdate("insert into intTable values 1,2,3");
>         Connection conn2 = s.getConnection();
> When using an EmbeddedXADataSource, cs1 and conn2 are the same connection. 
> However with Client they're not.
> Found during conversion of test checkDataSource to DataSourceTest.java.
> If this difference is correct, or acceptable, it should get documented...
> With DerbyNetClient, they're not the same.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to