Tomohito Nakayama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What I'm not sure is next sentence in above. > ============== > If the update rule is NO ACTION, Derby checks the dependent tables for > foreign key constraints */after/ all deletes* have been executed but > /before/ triggers have been executed. If any row in a dependent table > violates a foreign key constraint, the statement is rejected. > ============== > > I'm not sure why is "after all deletes" for "update". > I think this may be mistake ....
I agree. It doesn't make sense unless it reads "after all updates have been executed". Dag
