[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543646 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-3041: ------------------------------------------- No, this is mainly a clean-up issue, so unless it's causing a merge problem for other patches, I would say it's not worth porting it. It should be pretty safe, though, so please feel free if you have spare cycles! ;) > Merge the separate JDBC 2.0 and JDBC 3.0 implementations in the ij code > (Main/Main14 and utilMain/utilMain14) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DERBY-3041 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3041 > Project: Derby > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Tools > Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0 > Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen > Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 10.4.0.0 > > Attachments: d3041-1.diff, d3041-1.stat, d3041-2.diff, d3041-2.stat > > > The classes utilMain and utilMain14 contain utility methods for manipulating > the holdability of a connection or a statement. There is one implementation > for JDBC 2.0 JVMs and one implementation for JDBC 3.0 JVMs. Since Derby now > only supports JVMs which support JDBC 3.0 (or JSR-169 which is a subset of > JDBC 3.0), we could move code from utilMain14 to utilMain and delete > utilMain14. The class Main14 behaves identically to the class Main, except > that it returns utilMain14 instances, so once the utilMain14 class is > removed, Main14 can be removed as well. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.