[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12543646
 ] 

Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-3041:
-------------------------------------------

No, this is mainly a clean-up issue, so unless it's causing a merge problem for 
other patches, I would say it's not worth porting it. It should be pretty safe, 
though, so please feel free if you have spare cycles! ;)

> Merge the separate JDBC 2.0 and JDBC 3.0 implementations in the ij code 
> (Main/Main14 and utilMain/utilMain14)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3041
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3041
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools
>    Affects Versions: 10.4.0.0
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Assignee: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 10.4.0.0
>
>         Attachments: d3041-1.diff, d3041-1.stat, d3041-2.diff, d3041-2.stat
>
>
> The classes utilMain and utilMain14 contain utility methods for manipulating 
> the holdability of a connection or a statement. There is one implementation 
> for JDBC 2.0 JVMs and one implementation for JDBC 3.0 JVMs. Since Derby now 
> only supports JVMs which support JDBC 3.0 (or JSR-169 which is a subset of 
> JDBC 3.0), we could move code from utilMain14 to utilMain and delete 
> utilMain14. The class Main14 behaves identically to the class Main, except 
> that it returns utilMain14 instances, so once the utilMain14 class is 
> removed, Main14 can be removed as well.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to