[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-3327:
---------------------------------

    Attachment: DERBY-3327-4-full-b.stat
                DERBY-3327-4-full-b.diff

Thanks for looking at this, Rick! As for for the abstraction suggestion,
I definitely agree.  Uploading DERBY-3327-4-full-b, which replaces 
DERBY-3327-4-full (and earlier revs), which incorporates your suggestion!


> SQL roles: Implement authorization stack
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3327
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Security, SQL
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
>             Fix For: 10.4.0.0
>
>         Attachments: DERBY-3327-1.diff, DERBY-3327-1.stat, DERBY-3327-2.diff, 
> DERBY-3327-2.stat, DERBY-3327-3.diff, DERBY-3327-3.stat, 
> DERBY-3327-4-full-b.diff, DERBY-3327-4-full-b.stat, DERBY-3327-4-full.diff, 
> DERBY-3327-4-full.stat
>
>
> The current LanguageConnectionContext keeps the user authorization identifier 
> for an SQL session.
> The lcc is shared context also for nested connections (opened from stored 
> procedures).
> So far, for roles, the current role has been stored in the lcc also. However, 
> SQL requires that
> authorization identifers be pushed on a "authorization stack" when calling a 
> stored procedure, cf.
> SQL 2003, vol 2, section 4.34.1.1 and 4.27.3.
> This allows a caller to keep its current role after a call even if changed by 
> the stored procedure.
> This issue will implement the current role name part ("cell") of the 
> authorization stack. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to