[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12583882#action_12583882
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-3571:
-------------------------------------------
All elements of SingleReleaseLOBTracker.trackColumn[] are false until
checkCurrentRow() is called (normally on ResultSet.next()). Doesn't this mean
that the LOBs in the first row returned from the query won't be released until
the transaction is completed?
In SingleReleaseLOBTracker.checkCurrentRow(), should trackColumn[i] be set to
true unconditionally rather than in the else block? Whether or not column i
were accessed in row n shouldn't affect whether we release the locator in row
n+1, should it?
Nit: SingleReleaseLOBTracker.noRelease() doesn't need the sanity check variable
(indexFound) if "break" is replaced with "return", and "ASSERT" is replaced
with "THROWASSERT". Actually, since columns[] is a sorted int array (isn't
it?), it should be possible to simplify this method further by using
Arrays.binarySearch().
Typo in ResultSet.createLOBColumnTracker(): "simply" -> "simplify"
> LOB locators are not released if the LOB columns are not accessed by the
> client
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3571
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3571
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDBC, Network Client
> Affects Versions: 10.3.2.1, 10.4.0.0, 10.5.0.0
> Reporter: Kristian Waagan
> Assignee: Kristian Waagan
> Attachments: derby-3571-1a-client_track_lob_fix.diff,
> derby-3571-1a-client_track_lob_fix.stat,
> derby-3571-1b-client_track_lob_fix.diff,
> derby-3571-1c-client_track_lob_fix.diff,
> derby-3571-1d-client_track_lob_fix.diff,
> derby-3571-1e-client_track_lob_fix.diff
>
>
> If the client creates a result set containing LOB locator columns and
> iterates through it without actually accessing the LOB columns, the locators
> are not released.
> The amount of locators and their associated LOB objects causes the server to
> consume large amounts of memory and it eventually gets an OOME.
> There are a few workarounds for this bug:
> a) Access and/or properly close the LOBs (i.e. Blob.free).
> This is partly dependent on DERBY-2892.
> b) Invoke Connection.commit (or rollback) periodically, which causes all
> locators on the connection to be released.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
