[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12641912#action_12641912
 ] 

Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-3919:
---------------------------------------

Well the build number is not considered as part of the version information 
considered for clearing  the SPS plans.  A quick fix for this problem on 10.1 
would be to bump the last digit to  10.1.3.3 and then the sps plans will get 
cleared when the user upgrades.

As for a general long term solution  I see the following options.
1) Always bump the last digit when generated code changes.
2) Bump the last digit with any change on a branch.
3) Somehow get the build number incorporated into the version number 
information stored in the database so that we clear sps plans when the build 
number changes.

I personally prefer option 2. I think it makes the version numbers clearer.  
Often user reports have the version but not the build number and that would 
help mitigate that problem as well.

I will go ahead and bump the last digit on 10.1, but would like input on a more 
long term solution.

Thanks

Kathey


> Changing derby versions can cause  java.lang.NoSuchMethodError on 
> DatabaseMetaData call
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3919
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3919
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.1.2.1
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Assignee: Kathey Marsden
>
> Running the following program on 10.1 latest and then switching to  10.1.3.2 
> - (580531)  and running it again causes the exception :
> C:/kmarsden/repro/10447] java GetSchemas
> xception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 
> org.apache.derby.iapi.sql.execute.ResultSetFactory.getBulkTableS
> anResultSet(Lorg/apache/derby/iapi/sql/Activation;JILorg/apache/derby/iapi/services/loader/GeneratedMethod;ILorg/apache
> derby/iapi/services/loader/GeneratedMethod;ILorg/apache/derby/iapi/services/loader/GeneratedMethod;IZ[[Lorg/apache/derb
> /iapi/store/access/Qualifier;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;ZZIIIZIIZDDLorg/apache/derby/iapi/services/loader/Gene
> atedMethod;)Lorg/apache/derby/iapi/sql/execute/NoPutResultSet;
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.exe.ac05550069x011dx254bxcb49x000000134c780.fillResultSet(Unknown
>  Source)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.exe.ac05550069x011dx254bxcb49x000000134c780.execute(Unknown 
> Source)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.GenericActivationHolder.execute(GenericActivationHolder.java:326)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.sql.GenericPreparedStatement.execute(GenericPreparedStatement.java:377)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedStatement.executeStatement(EmbedStatement.java:1123)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedPreparedStatement.executeStatement(EmbedPreparedStatement.java:1335)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedPreparedStatement.executeQuery(EmbedPreparedStatement.java:244)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedDatabaseMetaData.getSimpleQuery(EmbedDatabaseMetaData.java:3086)
>        at 
> org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedDatabaseMetaData.getSchemas(EmbedDatabaseMetaData.java:1641)
>        at GetSchemas.main(GetSchemas.java:9)
> import java.sql.*;
> public class GetSchemas {
>     public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{
>       Class.forName("org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver");
>       Connection conn = 
> DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:derby:wombat;create=true");
>       DatabaseMetaData dbmd = conn.getMetaData();
>       ResultSet rs = dbmd.getSchemas();
>       while (rs.next()) {
>           System.out.println(rs.getString(1));
>       }
>     }
> }
> Apparently the method signature changed but I thought the stored prepared 
> statements recompiled whenever you changed versions so would not have such 
> problems. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to